Michael Shermer

Michael Shermer

Michael Shermer is the publisher of Skeptic magazine, the Director of the Skeptic Society, the host of the Skeptics’ Lecture Series at the California Institute of Technology and the author of a regular column in Scientific American called “Skeptic”.

Shermer frequently appears in the US media as an advocate of the skeptical point of view. Although he is a historian rather than a scientist, he sees himself as an arbiter of scientific credibility and standard bearer of rational thought. “In a free society, skeptics are the watchdogs against irrationalism. Debunking is not simply a divestment of bunk; its utility is in offering a better alternative, along with a lesson in how thinking goes wrong” (Scientific American, June 2001, p. 23).

According to Wikipedia Shermer was once a fundamentalist Christian. Much of his writing concerns the personal experiences that shaped his worldview. He once tried to enhance his athletic abilities with various New Age techniques, such as iridology, rolfing, and mega-vitamins. He even kept a pyramid in his living room to increase energy. His skepticism developed in reaction to his earlier credulity. Shermer now reveals a similarly credulous attitude toward mainstream science itself.

An advocate of “Big Science”, in his book The Borderlands of Science (2002) Shermer outlines a series of criteria for distinguishing between real science and “baloney”. He particularly warns his readers against people who have ideologies to pursue, whose pattern of thinking “consistently ignores or distorts data not for creative purposes but for ideological agendas”. Unfortunately he himself has an ideology to pursue and makes untruthful and pseudoscientific claims.

For example, in his “Skeptic” column in Scientific American in March 2003, Shermer cited a research study published in The Lancet, a leading medical journal, by Pim van Lommel and colleagues. He asserted this study “delivered a blow” to the idea that the mind and the brain could separate. Yet the researchers argued the exact opposite, and showed that conscious experience outside the body took place during a period of clinical death when the brain was flatlined. As Jay Ingram, of the Canadian Discovery Channel, commented: “His use of this study to bolster his point is bogus … He could have said, ‘The authors think there’s a mystery, but I choose to interpret their findings differently’. But he didn’t. I find that very disappointing.” (Toronto Star, March 16, 2003).

Pim van Lommel wrote to the editor of Scientific American setting out the evidence that Shermer misrepresented. In August 2004, Dr. Petrus Pennanen wrote to point out ‘an extremely unscientific statement’ in an article by Shermer on telepathy. In November 2004, Professor John Poynton, President of the Society for Psychical Research, wrote to protest that Shermer’s activities are a distortion of the concept of skepticism.1

In relation to Rupert Sheldrake’s book The Sense of Being Stared At, Shermer claimed in USA Today that “the events Sheldrake describes don’t require a theory and are perfectly explicable by normal means”(Feb 26, 2003). When asked to substantiate this claim, he was unable to do so and admitted he had not seen the book.

In his August 2004 Skeptic column in Scientific American, Shermer launched an extraordinary attack on the widely respected physicist Freeman Dyson, of Princeton. He took exception to the fact that Freeman Dyson publicly concluded that paranormal phenomena might really exist, on the basis of “a great mass of evidence“ (New York Review of Books, March 25, 2004).

Dyson’s error, according to Shermer, was to be interested in people’s actual experiences:

“Even genius of this magnitude cannot override the cognitive biases that favour anecdotal thinking. The only way to find out if anecdotes resemble real phenomena is controlled tests. Either people can read other people’s minds (or ESP cards), or they can’t. Science has unequivocally demonstrated that they can’t – QED.“

This sounds like a crushing rebuttal of Dyson’s view, with the full weight of the authority of science. But it is untrue. There have been many scientific investigations of telepathy, and there is much evidence in its favour.

Shermer is a close associate of the conjurer James Randi. In January 2005 at the Stardust Hotel in Las Vegas, NV they gave a workshop together on how to get the skeptical message across, teaching would-be media skeptics the “tricks of the trade” so that they could be the one the media will call on “when the next UFO or psychic healer appears on the scene.”

Related Articles

Anomalous Events That Can Shake One’s Skepticism to the Core
by Michael Shermer, Scientific American, September 16, 2014

The Delicate Ego of Mr. Michael Shermer
by P.Z. Myers, Pharyngula, January 16, 2013

On This Website

Michael Shermer’s Unscientific Statement on the Non-Existence of Telepathy

  Michael Shermer's Unscientific Statement on the Non-Existence of Telepathy   Communication to the Editors of Scientific American by Dr. Petrus Pennanen   "To claim a proof of non-existence is only possible by overriding the scientific method with a set of beliefs taken as facts. That is called religion. If you want continue to publish...

continue reading

Michael Shermer in “The Skeptic’s Cage” on Coast to Coast AM

  Michael Shermer in "The Skeptic's Cage" on Coast to Coast AM   A Review of the Debate by Matthew Cromer   On January 23, 2006 the "Coast to Coast AM by George Noory" radio program hosted held its first "Skeptic's Cage" debate between skeptic Dr. Michael Shermer and three scientists engaged in psi research....

continue reading

Michael Shermer’s Sense and Nonsense

  Michael Shermer's Sense and Nonsense   Review of Michael Shermer’s "The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense" by Guy Lyon Playfair   Confirmation Bias and Exquisite Balance   Michael Shermer’s The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense (Oxford University Press, 2001) contains a good deal of sense. The author is founder-editor of...

continue reading

Michael Shermer and Reductionism’s End

  Michael Shermer and Reductionism's End   Analysis of a Conversation with Michael Shermer, Positivist by Ted Dace   Though Michael Shermer edits and publishes Skeptic magazine, he’s not so much a skeptic as a positivist. He certainly seems positive about a lot of things, in particular that life is purely a matter of mechanism....

continue reading

Michael Shermer, Do Skeptics Play Fair?

  Do Skeptics Play Fair?   Letter submitted to Scientific American on 31 October 2005 by Rupert Sheldrake   Who is the believer and who is the skeptic?   Skeptics spoil their own mission by following personal prejudice and hiding their agenda, which is to block the way for anyone who is a speculative or...

continue reading

Michael Shermer’s Quantum Quackery

  Michael Shermer's Quantum Quackery   Quantum Consciousness: What Do We Know? by Stuart Hameroff   Stuart Hameroff, M.D. is a Professor in the Departments of Anesthesiology and Psychology and the Director of the Center for Consciousness Studies at the University of Arizona   I read with interest Michael Shermer’s skeptical criticism of the surprise...

continue reading

Michael Shermer’s Attacks

  Michael Shermer's Attacks   Michael Shermer and "The Sense of Being Stared At" by Rupert Sheldrake     Michael Shermer is the publisher of Skeptic magazine, the Director of the Skeptic Society, the host of the Skeptics' Lecture Series at the California Institute of Technology, and the author of a regular column in Scientific...

continue reading

Michael Shermer Misrepresents Pim Van Lommel’s NDE Research

  Michael Shermer Misrepresents Pim Van Lommel's NDE Research   The Medical Evidence for Near Death Experiences by Pim van Lommel   In his "Skeptic" column in Scientific American in March 2003, Michael Shermer cited a research study published in The Lancet, a leading medical journal, by Pim van Lommel and colleagues. Shermer asserted that...

continue reading

Michael Shermer Distorts the Meaning of the Word “Skepticism”

  Michael Shermer Distorts the Meaning of the Word "Skepticism"   Letter to Scientific American by Professor John Poynton President of the Society for Psychical Research (SPR)   "It is disappointing to see a journal of science harbouring entrenched ignorance."   The classical meaning of the word 'skeptic' is inquiring, reflective. Regrettably the word has...

continue reading

Michael Shermer’s Attacks, Updated

  Michael Shermer's Attacks, Updated   by Rupert Sheldrake   From:   Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home by Rupert Sheldrake, Broadway Books, 2011.   Michael Shermer is a professional skeptic rather than a scientist, although he often claims to speak for science. He is the publisher of Skeptic magazine, the Director...

continue reading

Michael Shermer’s Muddled Mind on Evolution

  Michael Shermer's Muddled Mind on Evolution by Ted Dace   In the muddled mind of Michael Shermer, the clash of evolution and creationism boils down to a dispute between natural design and artificial design.   Author of Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design, Michael Shermer has effectively reduced the debate to an...

continue reading

Photo credit: Wikipedia