Home > Controversies > Debates > The Telepathy Debate


Debates

 

The Telepathy Debate

Prof Lewis Wolpert vs Dr Rupert Sheldrake
Edward Nugee, QC in the chair

Reproduced from Nature 22nd January 2004 Telepathy debate hits London by John Whitfield


Audience charmed by the paranormal.
Many people believe there is evidence of the power of the mind.
Scientists tend to steer clear of public debates with advocates of the paranormal. And judging from the response of a London audience to a rare example of such a head-to-head conflict last week, they are wise to do so.

Lewis Wolpert, a developmental biologist at University College London, made the case against the existence of telepathy at a debate at the Royal Society of Arts (RSA) in London on 15 January. Rupert Sheldrake, a former biochemist and plant physiologist at the University of Cambridge who has taken up parapsychology, argued in its favour. And most of the 200-strong audience seemed to agree with him.

Wolpert is one of Britain's best-known public spokesmen for science. But few members of the audience seemed to be swayed by his arguments.

Sheldrake, who moved beyond the scientific pale in the early 1980s by claiming that ideas and forms can spread by a mysterious force he called morphic resonance, kicked off the debate.
He presented the results of tests of extrasensory perception, together with his own research on whether people know who is going to phone or e-mail them, on whether dogs know when their owners are coming home, and on the allegedly telepathic bond between a New York woman and her parrot. "Billions of perfectly rational people believe that they have had these experiences," he said.

An open mind is a very bad thing - everything falls out - Lewis Wolpert, University College London

Wolpert countered that telepathy was "pathological science", based on tiny, unrepeatable effects backed up by fantastic theories and an ad hoc response to criticism. "The blunt fact is that there's no persuasive evidence for it," he said.

For Ann Blaber, who works in children's music and was undecided on the subject, Sheldrake was the more convincing. "You can't just dismiss all the evidence for telepathy out of hand," she said. Her view was reflected by many in the audience, who variously accused Wolpert of "not knowing the evidence" and being "unscientific".

In staging the debate, the RSA joins a growing list of London organizations taking a novel approach to science communication 1. "We want to provide a platform for controversial subjects," says Liz Winder, head of lectures at the RSA.

References

1. Giles, J. Museum breaks mould in attempts to lure reluctant visitors Nature, 426, 6, doi:10.1038/426006a (2003). |Article|


For further material on the RSA Telepathy debate, including the full text from the meeting, and an audio tape of the debate
www.sheldrake.org/controversies/telepathy_debate.html

Top of Page


 


If you have any comments or suggestions on this website please email morphlist@aol.com
Copyright © The Association for Skeptical Investigations


 


Debates


The Anti-Sheldrake Phenomenon

- by Ted Dace

Attacking the Theory of Morphic Resonance


Beyond Demonic Genes

- by David Sloan Wilson

Why Richard Dawkins is Wrong About Religion


Michael Shermer in the Skeptic's Cage

- by Matthew Cromer

A Review of the Debate


Sam Harris's Faith in Eastern Spirituality and Muslim Torture

- by John Gorenfeld

Controversy over Sam Harris's Atheist Views


Quantum Consciousness: What Do We Know?

- by Prof Stuart Hameroff

A Reply to Quantum Quackery


The Psychic Challenge

- by Montague Keen

Randi's "Ultimate Challenge"


European Skeptics Congress, 2005

- by Dr Richard Hardwick

Pseudoscience, Alternative Medicine And The Media